Know-Your-Customer (KYC) checks have long been associated with high levels of customer friction. Traditionally, these assessments were largely carried out by financial institutions, looking to conduct due diligence and safeguard against the legal consequences of financial crime. Creating a seamless customer journey was not a priority when designing legacy systems for identity proofing.
Until recently, customers looking to open up a bank account would expect to take paper-based documents into a bank branch, where representatives could assess whether the credentials are genuine, and match the identity of the individual in front of them. This process of identity proofing is fairly inconvenient for customers, costly for businesses and problematic from a security perspective as human error may lead to fraudulent credentials being overlooked.
Evolving Challenges in a Digital-First World
As more and more consumer interactions have shifted online, enterprises in a variety of sectors have found themselves having to engage in KYC, to securely verify the identities of customers opening accounts. The more consumers are required to repeat the process of identity proofing with each online services the greater the demand for frictionless customer experience becomes.
‘The Battle to Onboard 2020’ a research report by Signicat, found that 25% of consumers describe financial service applications as between ‘difficult and painful’ to complete, as it is time consuming and too much personal information has to be provided. A shocking 63% of European consumers surveyed abandoned a financial onboarding process in the past year.
Even more crucially, the more customer accounts are opened digitally the greater number of access points for those looking to commit fraud. If banks, mobile network operators and many other businesses must enroll new customers without meeting them in-person, they must establish a high level of trust that an individual is who they say, rather than a fraudster or bot. Secure digital identity proofing is crucial to preventing financial crime and meeting regulations.
New Approaches to Identity Proofing
Clearly, traditional approaches to identity proofing, utilizing subjective human assessments, are not sufficient in today’s digital landscape. Many banks and other enterprises are employing new technologies throughout their onboarding processes, whether that be mobile technology to scan documents, biometrics to identify individuals unique attributes or advanced analytics to assess identity records.
These digital methods offer convenient, real-time solutions to identity proofing, allowing customers to be onboarded remotely, but securely. Of course, while some customers will eagerly embrace new technologies others will not be comfortable with these process for reasons of privacy concern or technical capabilities. This has to be taken into account when building an onboarding process.
Enterprises that have been able to implement digital onboarding technologies will likely have seen the benefits. The Paypers, Digital Onboarding and KYC Report 2020 reports that financial institutions can onboard new investors in 5 minutes, online credit registration takes a few minutes and signing up for an insurance account takes just 30 seconds. All of these processes would have once taken at least 4-5 days.
Branch Banking is Out, Mobile is In
The growing appetite for remote onboarding was certainly not unprecedented, given recent trends in digital banking. In a world where mobile banking has overtaken, it seems outdated that a customer who already manages so many everyday tasks directly from their device, should have to visit a bank branch to open a new account.
Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face banking was in decline, reflected in the increased popularity of digital-first challengers, such as Monzo and Starling. CACI research predict that from 2017 to 2022 mobile transactions will increase by 121%, and by 2022 the average consumer will visit a bank branch 3 times a year or less.
Just last month, HSBC announced the planned closure of 82 UK branches between April and September of this year. Jackie Uhi, HSBC UK’s Head of Network noted that the closures were not a direct product of COVID-19, instead pointing to increased adoption of digital alternatives and a decline in branch usage. In fact, Uhi highlights, only 10% of customer contact now happens through HSBC branches.
The HSBC experience appears to reflect a long-term trend. According to consumer group Which?, more than a third of UK bank branches closed between 2015 to 2019. Naturally, as branch presence declines and mobile adoption grows, so does the pressure for banks to enable end-to-end remote services. As a result, even prior to the pandemic customers were increasingly offered digital or hybrid options for completing KYC. A survey running from 2019 to early 2020, revealed 68% of financial institutions were already engaged in initiatives related to digital identity verification.
The Impact of COVID on Speed to Market
Of course whilst the circumstances surrounding COVID-19 are not solely responsible for shifting consumer appetite, we cannot ignore the drastic acceleration towards digital in recent months. Business around the world have turned to technology as a means to continuing with everyday meetings, tasks and procedures that just a few months ago were only carried out in-person.
In the financial world, institutions have been left with no choice but to allow consumers to open accounts, apply for loans and carry out transactions, through online and mobile channels. A greater urgency exists than ever before around removing any physical touchpoints left in the onboarding process, creating a far greater incentive for speed to market when it comes to digitalizing identity proofing and compliance processes.
Of course, fraudsters have also been quick to capitalize on this drastic change in circumstances, finding new opportunities to commit fraud or generate illicit funds. Financial institutions have been forced to react to a fast-evolving threat landscape while continuing to meet regulation. Those who are able to incorporate digital identity proofing to their online offering, will likely adapt faster to the ‘new normal’ in the months to come.
The Race Between Technology and Regulation
A significant challenge has been the extent to which regulation can keep up and make sufficient allowances for the unpredictable, knock-on effects of the pandemic. In a June 2020 post for example, Lexis Nexis reported that banks and insurers were unable to accept electronic death certificates for customer offboarding, even where this was the only option available to coroners.
While desperate times may call for desperate measures, there is still a need for caution to avoid drastic, permanent changes to regulation that may have unperceived risks later down the line. Looking to the future, if physical documents checks are ever to be fully removed from the onboarding process, regulators will need to identify any legal restraints which prevent banks from meeting compliance guidelines through digital identity proofing.
Singapore is one such success story, where the government has certified digital citizen ID ‘My Info’ as an independent and reliable source for identity proofing. As a result, more than 60 financial institutions are leveraging MyInfo to onboard customers, without needing to obtain physical identity documents. In Europe, where KYC and AML policies still need standardization, this will likely be more complex to achieve.
In the digital-first landscape ahead, financial institutions and many other enterprises will have to consider secure, digital identity proofing in order to meet customer needs, while managing risk and regulation. In many ways the pandemic has only highlighted the urgency around those KYC and AML procedures no longer suited to a digital world.
The discussion continues at FTT Identity on 17th March, as we look at how banks can on-board/off-board customers securely and seamlessly, while meeting a growing demand for remote identity proofing. Join international Rockstar Speakers from banks, governments, technology providers and policy institutions.